“Above My Paygrade”
By Kyle Pope
O
nly three days after taking office, President Barack Obama
quietly, with no media attention signed an executive order striking down
President Bush’s ban on federal money going to international
“family planning” organizations which offer and counsel abortion as
an option. As a result of this action not only can taxpayer dollars now be used
to promote and carry out abortions, but groups which lobby to further legalize
and promote abortion as a means of contraception will receive federal funds.
The President has also promised to sign the so-called “Freedom of Choice
Act” (FOCA), which, if it passes Congress, will remove State and Federal
prohibitions against abortion, including bans on partial-birth abortion and
measures requiring parental notification of minors who seek abortions. FOCA
will also seek to compel all medical facilities to offer abortions in that it
would grant individuals the right to sue facilities which refuse to provide
abortion. This measure would essentially write into law the infamous 1973 Roe
vs. Wade Supreme Court ruling which has allowed abortions to take place since
that time. In spite of President Obama’s claim that he “has no
desire to continue the stale and fruitless debate” over abortion, his
aggressive moves to promote it will force those who value human life into a
vocal opposition which is neither “stale” or
“fruitless.”
Some
who supported President Obama may have been surprised by these moves. The fact
is, his actions should come as no surprise. Before the election, in a televised
discussion with the presidential candidates and the denominational preacher
Rick Warren, both men were asked the question—“when does life
begin?” The then, Senator Obama skirted around the question, by
responding, “that’s a question that’s above my
pay-grade.” I’m sure to some who heard these words, the Senator
appeared to be open-minded, intellectual, and willing to yield to those who
knew more about such matters than himself. However, the actions of his first
days in office make it clear that he felt that the answer was well within his
“pay-grade!” His actions clearly show that he holds the conviction
that either life does not begin at conception, or that a child within the womb
is not “life.” While many Christians find themselves moved to a
state of despair over the unfolding of these events, perhaps it would be
fitting for us to remind ourselves of a few things.
1. The Bible condemns
abortion. The Bible makes it
clear that it is God who forms a child in the womb (Psalm 139:13-14). This
divine formation is described as a “child” or “babe”
whether in or outside of the womb (Luke 1:41; 2:12; Matthew 1:18). The Law of
Moses taught that the child in the womb was life. Exodus 21:22-25 addressed injury
to a pregnant woman and her child. If she “gives birth
prematurely”[*] yet “no harm follows” (i.e. to mother or child)
only a fine was to be charged. If harm to mother or child occurred the penalty
was to be determined “life for life.” The Bible throughout condemns
the taking of innocent life (Genesis 9:6; Exodus 21:12; Matthew 19:18;
Revelation 21:8). As such, it is no wonder that in some of the earliest
Christian writings after the New Testament it was affirmed that Christians
teach, “you shall not murder a child by abortion, nor shall you kill it
when it is born” (Epistle of Barnabas 19.5; also Didache
2.2).
2. The fact that a
government may fund something which is sinful does not excuse the Christian
from paying taxes. Whenever
a government moves to financially support sinful and unscriptural behavior,
Christians struggle with whether or not that makes us complicit in sin through
the taxes we pay. Some years ago this came up when anti-religious and
pornographic artwork was produced under federally funded grants through the
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Now, the same question rises over
federal funds supporting abortion. We are blessed in the United States to live
in a democratic republic in which we can voice our convictions. Yet, the
example of Jesus answers once and for all whether payment of taxes constitutes
cooperation in sin. When Jesus was questioned about payment of taxes, Jesus
raised no reservation about the distribution of such monies. He called
attention to Caesar’s portrait on the currency and declared powerfully, “render
therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things
that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21). When these words were said, Roman
tax dollars supported pagan idolatry and as time went on ultimately supported
emperor worship. Yet, Jesus still taught that taxes must be paid (cf. Romans
13:6).
3. It is not the role of
the church to engage in politics—but it is the role of the church to
declare the truth. We must
stand in opposition to the moves made by the denominational world to use the
pulpit and the local church to promote political causes, candidates, or
parties. Paul told Timothy that the church is the “pillar and ground of
the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15). The church has a spiritual focus which
(frankly) is more important than geo-political forces. Daniel prophesied the
establishment of this realm of Christ’s rule over His church promising, “the
God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the
kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume
all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever” (Daniel 2:44). The church
is a spiritual kingdom which exists independent of who is in office, which
nation we live in, or what issues man values at the time. Yet, we must realize
that as the “pillar and ground of the truth” it is absolutely our
duty to speak boldly and openly with regard to what Scripture teaches regarding
sin and righteousness. Isaiah 5:20 proclaimed, “Woe to those who call
evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for
darkness.” Abortion is sin! Homosexuality is sin! Just as adultery,
sexual immorality, dishonestly, unscriptural divorce, and remarriage, or even
vulgar speech is sin. We do not uphold the work of the church if we remain
silent in proclamation of truth.
[*] Some translations
incorrectly render this “has a miscarriage.” That communicates the
wrong idea. This is not the usual wording for miscarriage or still birth, as
seen in Genesis 31:38 or Job 3:16. Instead, it literally means, “her
children come out.” Job 3:11 uses it in reference to “when I came
out of the womb.” This makes it clear that the “harm” to both
mother and child fall within the “life for life” penalty.